In 1973 legislation was passed
introducing the beginning of the Domestic Purpose Benefit. This benefit was
intended to give mothers who had lost their husbands, or who were not being
financially supported by their husband’s, security to raise their children. Men
were also allowed to claim this benefit if they were raising one or more children
independently. Women who lived alone and cared for incapacitated relatives
could also claim this benefit (“1973 DPB
Legislation introduced”n.d.).
The stereo typed family of mum and dad and the kids was very much changing around this time, bringing with it the need for such a benefit. However this came with much criticism from some suggesting that it was encouraging beneficiaries to become complacent about returning to the workforce. Others argued that it was the right of the mother to stay home and raise their children without having the help of financial support of the men (“1973 DPB Legislation introduced”n.d.).
The stereo typed family of mum and dad and the kids was very much changing around this time, bringing with it the need for such a benefit. However this came with much criticism from some suggesting that it was encouraging beneficiaries to become complacent about returning to the workforce. Others argued that it was the right of the mother to stay home and raise their children without having the help of financial support of the men (“1973 DPB Legislation introduced”n.d.).
The Government has put together figures estimating that only a third of all domestic purposes beneficiaries have been on the benefit since teenagers. This figure has been challenged by writer Simon Collins (2010) as incorrect.Collins maintains that “responding to an official Information Act request, Ministry head Peter Hughes to economist Susan St Jhon that 52 per cent of mothers on the DPB and aged 29 or under at the end of last year first received the DPB or EMA as teenagers” (Collins, 2010).
Important statistics about DPB
- There were 97,000 New Zealanders on DPB for sole parents in February 2010. This is up from 90,000 in February 2009 - an increase of 8 per cent.
- 43,000 sole parents on DPB have a child aged six and over. Over half had one child and 30 per cent had two children.
- Māori make up 38 per cent of DPB sole parents who will be work-tested, while Pacific Island people make up 8 per cent of this group.
- 12,500 DPB who will be work-tested have recent work experience or have completed training.
- New Zealand is one of the few countries in the OECD to have no work expectations for sole parents with children aged under 18 years.
- 15 per cent of sole parents on DPB have been in some paid work during the last year.
- Statistics show the number of sole mothers who work full-time has increased significantly in the last 15 years.
- Sole mother full-time employment rates increased rapidly when work tests were previously introduced for people receiving DPB (1997-2003). (Ministry of Social Development n.d.).
References
Brennan-Tupara, 2011 Single mum on DPB for decades. Stuff. Co.nz Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/5652215/Single-mum-on-DPB- for-decades
Collins, S. (2010). Many mums on benefit since teens. The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved from. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10664607
New Zealand History online [N.Z H], 1973 DPB Legislation introduced. Retrieved from
Ministry of Social Development Domestic Purposes benefit fact sheet future progress (n.d) Retrieved from http://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/newsroom/factsheets/future-focus/domestic-purposes-benefit.html#ImportantstatisticsaboutDPB6
Three News, 2013. Beneficiary numbers spike in December quarter. Retrieved from
Beneficiary numbers spike in Dec quarter - Story - Politics - 3 News http://www.3news.co.nz/Beneficiary-numbers-spike-in-Dec-quarter/tabid/1607/articleID/283422/Default.aspx#ixzz2QUCi8qsH
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteLast week I went and listened to Dr Russell Wills speak about child poverty in New Zealand. He spoke in some detail about the domestic purposes benefit. In an article he wrote for the NZ Herald he also sees the benefit as a cycle moving from one generation to the next (Wills, 2011, http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10761357).
ReplyDeleteI completely agree that if a mother stays on the benefit for an extended period of time without furthering their career oppotunities, for example studying, it can be very difficult for them to find a job that pays enough to support their familiy. This can in turn effect a woman's confidence levels and mentality, as seen in the report showing the correlation between job fears and antidepressants http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/job-fears-fuel-rise-in-anti-depressant-use-5404745
From the statistics you are showing so far, I learnt that New Zealand had a problem! From what you have posted, it seems to me that people took advantage of the system. This not only looks bad but I believe also made people think that DPB people are the same.
ReplyDeleteIt is a shame because people that really rely on the benefit get a bad name, such as mothers that choose to stay at home with their children.
We have discussed many times in class about the importance of education, but we also talked about the importance of parents as the first teacher. If sole mothers or fathers will not have this support from the country, what are we really teaching our children?
In the New Zealand Herald (Jan18, 2013) it explains that since last year, when new policy by the Social Development Minister Paula Bennett came out requiring sole parents to get jobs when their youngest child turns five, the number of sole parents on the domestic purposes benefit dropped by 5000 (Trevett, 2013).
It sounds good that the numbers are dropping but at what cost? Who is benefiting from it and who is losing?
I looked on the internet and I found this quote that sums up my thoughts.
New Zealand has an obligation under
UNCROC to look after the best interests
of all children. Children’s needs should
be at the heart of social policy, not
judgment about whether their parents are
deserving or not. It is time for a new
language that recognises the vital role
of parenting and treats sole parents
with respect. (Child Poverty Action Group, 2013)
Trevett, C. (2013). Bennett trumpets 5000 on DPB. New Zealand Herald. Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?
c_id=1&objectid=10859853
Child Poverty Action Group. (2013). Myths and facts about DPB
recipients-CPAG.Retrieved from
http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/16464922/myths- and-facts-about-dpb-recipients-cpag/)
Hi Robyn, your blog is very interesting, full of useful information. I found that I learnt a lot of information that I did not know. The one point that you made in your last paragraph was the length of time that people are on the domestic purposes benefit and I was shocked to see that people have been on it for as long as fifteen years. Personally I view people like that as ripping off the system and that they should have something in place that ensures people are not on the benefit for that long. It makes it unfair for people that work hard and earn their keep compared to someone that has an income for that long with out earning it. But that is just my point of view.
ReplyDeleteRealistically there really are many people that truly need the benefit, and that is what it is there for.
It would be interesting to see more information on teenagers receiving the domestic purposes benefit, I found these helpful graphs and information from Victoria. http://igps.victoria.ac.nz/WelfareWorkingGroup/Downloads/Working%20papers/MSD-Overviews-of-DPB-SB-IB.pdf I saw that people that start on the benefit as teenagers stay on the benefit a lot longer.
Keep up the good research